White Paper: Assess, Select and Implement: How to Choose the Right Mechanical Integrity Software For Your Facility
According to Inspectioneering Journal’s Facilities Asset Integrity Management Benchmarking Survey, 90 percent of reporting facilities maintain an Inspection Data Management System (IDMS) as part of their reliability programs, which can be anything from a simple excel sheet to an advanced mechanical integrity software program. However, 59 percent of facilities have challenges with the operability of these programs. For many companies, these challenges stem from a lack of efficiency when assessing, selecting and implementing the appropriate software program for the unique needs of the facility. To help companies meet efficiency excellence, this paper offers instructions on how to choose the right mechanical integrity software based on the facility’s current pain points and what goals they hope to achieve in the future.
Meet the Authors
Curious how quantitative modeling can help you identify the value of your facility’s CML placements?
Reach out to our authors, Lynne Kaley or Siddharth Sanghavi.
The Value of Quantifying Uncertainty
You cannot maximize the value of your risk analysis without the ability to quantify the uncertainty of when an asset will fail. While monitoring various elements such as thickness measurements and flow rate can reduce uncertainty, ultimately, the value of monitoring is limited.
In this video, Ryan Sitton, Pinnacle’s Founder and CEO, walks through the impact of leveraging your data to better define whether an upcoming task should be a repair, replacement, or upgrade to reduce spending levels and downtime.